Skip to content
Axis EconomicsIndependent research and analysis
HomeReportsAboutContactAccountTRWork with me
You’re in controlHelp us make Axis more useful

Cookies needed for sessions, security and your language choice are always on. If you allow it, we also measure pseudonymous first-party usage to learn which content is useful. We do not retain raw IP addresses, build advertising profiles or send data to a third-party analytics service. Review cookies and purposes

Axis Economics/Editorial standards
Accountability

Editorial standards and corrections policy

This page defines the public standard used to prepare, review, update and, when necessary, withdraw Axis Economics publications.

Last updated: 30 July 2026

Editorial independence

Research conclusions are determined by the available evidence, declared methods and stated limitations. Commercial relationships must not purchase a predetermined conclusion. Any material sponsor or funding relationship is disclosed on the publication page.

Sources and evidence

Quantitative claims should identify a traceable source, period, definition and material exclusion. Primary and official sources are preferred where suitable. Conflicting evidence and comparability limits are not hidden to create a cleaner narrative.

Review and data checks

Every publication identifies its author. Where a separate reviewer or data checker participated, that role is named in the publication record. A blank reviewer field must not be represented as independent peer review.

Corrections, revisions and withdrawal

Typographical changes that do not affect meaning may be corrected without a new version. Changes to figures, conclusions, scope or method require an updated date and revision record. A publication may be withdrawn when its central evidence is materially unreliable; the URL should remain available with a clear withdrawal notice.

Funding and conflicts

Each report records its funding position and any conflict that a reasonable reader could consider relevant. “No external funding” or “no conflict declared” is stated only when it is factually accurate.

Artificial intelligence

Any material use of generative or analytical AI in research, drafting, translation or data processing is described in the report disclosure. Human authors remain responsible for source verification, calculations, interpretation and the published text.

Data and code

Underlying data or code is shared when licensing, confidentiality and practical constraints permit. When it cannot be shared, the report should still describe transformations, material exclusions and reproducibility limits.

Citation and reuse

Readers may cite public reports using the preferred citation shown on the report page. Third-party source material remains subject to its own copyright and licensing terms. Charts or extracts should retain the Axis Economics attribution and report URL.

Report a correction

If you identify a data, source, calculation or presentation error, send the report URL and verifiable evidence through the contact form. Reports are assessed by materiality; substantive changes are reflected in the updated date and revision record.

Report a correction →
Axis Economics

Economic research for decision-makers, with visible sources, explicit assumptions and actionable conclusions.

Explore

All reportsResearch approachContactPrivacyTerms of usePublishing principlesAtom feed

Publishing principles

Source transparency · Method discipline · Explicit limitations

© 2026 Axis EconomicsIndependent economic research platform.